<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme court denied leave of appeal in the CSS case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.turre.com/2008/12/supreme-court-denied-leave-of-appeal-in-the-css-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.turre.com/2008/12/supreme-court-denied-leave-of-appeal-in-the-css-case/</link>
	<description>Experts in Technology, Media, and Entertainment Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikko Välimäki</title>
		<link>http://www.turre.com/2008/12/supreme-court-denied-leave-of-appeal-in-the-css-case/comment-page-1/#comment-131067</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikko Välimäki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turre.com/blog/?p=188#comment-131067</guid>
		<description>Ossi, you are correct on condition that we accept the Court of Appeals statement of facts that you cannot circumvent CSS &quot;accidentally&quot;. Anyone familiar with CSS encryption knows that many people who circumvent it with some open source player do it without knowing a system called CSS exists in the first place. Think your parents or your wife, for example. This is why I cannot personally accept the conclusions of the Court of Appeals and keep on claiming that CSS is indeed &quot;ineffective&quot; in Finland with correct reading of the facts. One random court reading the facts like it did (and without hearing the case) does not change my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ossi, you are correct on condition that we accept the Court of Appeals statement of facts that you cannot circumvent CSS &#8220;accidentally&#8221;. Anyone familiar with CSS encryption knows that many people who circumvent it with some open source player do it without knowing a system called CSS exists in the first place. Think your parents or your wife, for example. This is why I cannot personally accept the conclusions of the Court of Appeals and keep on claiming that CSS is indeed &#8220;ineffective&#8221; in Finland with correct reading of the facts. One random court reading the facts like it did (and without hearing the case) does not change my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ossi Mäntylahti</title>
		<link>http://www.turre.com/2008/12/supreme-court-denied-leave-of-appeal-in-the-css-case/comment-page-1/#comment-131037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ossi Mäntylahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turre.com/blog/?p=188#comment-131037</guid>
		<description>It however seems that *distribution* or assisting distribution of DeCSS / libdvdcss components is illegal in Finland.

It would be interesting to know if posting information about how to obtain decss components can be seen as providing assistance for breaking css. Example: posting a blog entry or newspaper article illustrating how to to add unofficial decss repository for Ubuntu and downloading decss component with package manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It however seems that *distribution* or assisting distribution of DeCSS / libdvdcss components is illegal in Finland.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to know if posting information about how to obtain decss components can be seen as providing assistance for breaking css. Example: posting a blog entry or newspaper article illustrating how to to add unofficial decss repository for Ubuntu and downloading decss component with package manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
